February 18, 2008
Missouri seeks to reclassify EC as "abortion-inducing medication"
This just makes me want to scream. Literally.
After years of imposing restrictions on abortion, Missouri lawmakers are now taking aim at emergency contraception, commonly known as the morning-after pill.Legislation presented to a House panel last week would classify emergency contraception as an abortion-inducing medication, contrary to the definition used by the Food and Drug Administration.
The bill also would protect pharmacies from lawsuits and from punishment by state regulators for refusing to sell or fill a prescription for any drug defined as triggering an abortion.
Pamela Sumners, executive director of NARAL Pro-Choice Missouri said that filling prescriptions “is an essential function of your job...If you become a pharmacist, you should do your job."
And let's say it one more time: Emergency contraception is NOT abortion.
Posted by Jessica at 10:58 AM | Comments (0)
December 20, 2007
Some Holiday Cheer: Good News on Plan B!
Nancy Keenan is president of NARAL Pro-Choice America.
Happy Holidays!
One year ago, Carrie Baker – a mother of two from Rome, GA – was unable to obtain the emergency contraceptive Plan B® at her local Kroger pharmacy. Carrie shared her story with you, and you helped turn up the public pressure on Kroger Co. by asking the company to adopt a corporate-wide policy to ensure that people age 18 or older can purchase Plan B ® on site, without delay or judgment.
I wanted to thank the more than 21,000 pro-choice Americans who took action so I have an exciting update to share with you!
We spoke with officials at Kroger Co. and – because of the hard work of NARAL Pro-Choice America activists – Kroger Co. has assured us that its policy requires all of its pharmacies to stock Plan B® and have an on-site employee to dispense it to any customer who asks. In addition, Kroger Co. officials provided a contact and phone number for customers who experience any difficulty accessing Plan B® at their pharmacies.
This isn’t just lip service: A recent NARAL Pro-Choice America survey found that only 4.6 percent of Kroger Co. pharmacies are not stocking Plan B®. That’s down from 21 percent since we first asked you to take action in the spring!
If you go to a Kroger Co. pharmacy and experience a situation like Carrie Baker’s, please call customer service specialist Pat Collins at 1-800-KROGERS (1-800-576-4377). Kroger Co. has promised to give these calls special attention.
Remember, it’s up to us to make sure that women who need Plan B® can get it! To find out more about our Plan B®: Where’s Yours? campaign, visit our website.
Thank you for all you do to help protect women’s health.
Posted by Blog for Choice at 3:16 PM | Comments (11)
December 12, 2007
In the meantime...
While a Pennsylvania bill requiring hospitals to provide emergency contraception has stalled in the House of Reps, it's good to see that Wisconsin is at least moving forward with a similar bill:
The Assembly, which worked into the early morning hours Wednesday on a variety of measures, passed a revised version of that bill on a 56-41 vote just before midnight.Both houses must adopt identical legislation before it can go to Gov. Jim Doyle for his signature. Republicans who control the Assembly objected to a final reading of the bill Tuesday night, meaning the full body won't be able to vote to send it to the Senate until January.
The bill has already gone through a number of challenges, including efforts to get parental notification and allow hospitals to pull the old "conscience clause" and let them refuse EC on "moral or religious" grounds, but it was a no-go. Rep. Ann Hraychuck, D - Balsam Lake hit the nail on the head: "This is not about what my moral beliefs are. This is not about what your moral beliefs are. This is about victim's rights."
Indeed.
Posted by Jessica at 12:10 PM | Comments (0)
November 28, 2007
And you thought George W. Bush was bad…
by Elizabeth Shipp, political director, NARAL Pro-Choice America
As the Republicans prepare for tonight’s YouTube debate on CNN, it seems that they have women’s reproductive rights (or lack thereof) on the brain. It’s a veritable “I trust women LESS than you do” free-for-all in the daily news clips, and it’s pretty scary. With the exception of one candidate, all of the Republican candidates have called specifically for Roe v. Wade to be overturned.
In one corner, you have the National Right to Life Committee endorsing Fred Thompson. In another corner you have the co- founder of the Moral Majority throwing his support behind “multiple-choice” Mitt Romney. And then there’s Mike Huckabee, who is trying to out “anti-choice” them all. Yesterday’s LA Times had a great story if you’d like to read more.
Could it get any worse than what’s already being said about women and their apparent inability to make choices for themselves? Well, the answer might surprise you.
These guys sure have been busy talking out of both sides of their respective mouths.
As bad as these candidates are on a woman’s right to choose, the silence has been deafening when it comes to one issue: BIRTH CONTROL. Where do these presidential candidates stand on this issue?
NARAL Pro-Choice America asked its member-activists to submit their own questions for tonight’s debate. Here are some examples of the questions these candidates should answer:
1. Do you think it’s okay for an insurance company to pay for Viagra but refuse to cover prescription contraception?
2. Do you think it’s okay for a pharmacy to refuse to fill a woman’s prescription for birth control based on an employee’s personal view against contraception?
3. Do you believe hospital emergency rooms should be allowed to withhold information from a rape survivor about emergency contraception--which can prevent a pregnancy if taken soon after the assault?
4. If you support the so-called Human Life Amendment, does that mean that you also support banning most common forms of birth control, like the pill?
With everything going on in our world these days, it may seem like these questions aren't the most important ones to ask of these candidates. But trust me – if you care about your health and your ability to make your own choices without political interference, the answers to these questions are critically important.
We can't afford for these anti-choice candidates to continue to refuse to address important issues that impact our daily lives. (We saw what happened to us in '00 and '04 when we let that happen!) If you want to learn more about the presidential candidates' positions on choice, go to: http://www.prochoiceamerica.org/elections/statements/.
Posted by Blog for Choice at 1:04 PM | Comments (0)
October 26, 2007
Thanking Harris Teeter, North Carolina Style
Great news coming at you from North Carolina:
Earlier last week, NARAL Pro-Choice North Carolina announced that Harris Teeter pharmacies in North Carolina are officially stocking the emergency contraceptive Plan B®!Amy Woodell, statewide organizer for NARAL Pro-Choice North Carolina, has a great post up on The Progressive Pulse - North Carolina's Policy Watch Blog - about their recent victory with Harris Teeter.
Please join NARAL Pro-Choice North Carolina and thank Harris Teeter for fixing the immediate problem and ask them to share their policy with their customers... so women know that they can obtain the medication at any Harris Teeter store.
Posted by Molly at 1:14 PM | Comments (0)
October 19, 2007
Senators Condemn Orr Appointment
You must check out this letter that 19 other senators wrote to HHS Sec. Michael Leavitt on the appointment of Dr. Susan Orr as Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Population Affairs. An excerpt:
Dr. Orr has a troubling history of opposing federal funding for contraception, which is counter to the mission of the office to which she has been appointed. In 2001, she spoke in favor of a Bush administration plan to drop a requirement that health insurance for federal employees must cover birth control. “We’re quite pleased because fertility is not a disease,” Dr. Orr said at the time on contraception. “It’s not a medical necessity that you have it.”
Uh, is Dr. Orr for real?
Sadly, as many other bloggers have pointed out, this is just one of the many troubling things from Dr. Orr’s history. So kudos to those senators for sending this letter and condemning this nomination. Click here to read the letter and see if your senators have signed on.
Posted by Molly at 10:14 AM | Comments (1)
September 25, 2007
Teens lack EC access in NYC?
As gleeful as I was about yesterday's news that New York has rejected federal funds that would have gone towards abstinence-only education programs, having access to the resources you're educated about would probably help too.
Despite New York City's campaign launched in 2005 to incease access to emergency contraception and family planning services, it looks like teens may have slipped past the radar. A study of teen health clinics operated by the New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation found that less than half of them provided emergency contraception and prescriptions for birth control. Yikes.
The corporation claims that the report was inaccurate and misleading, but would look into training staff at their clinics who might be asked about the availability of EC.
Posted by Jessica at 12:16 PM | Comments (0)
August 28, 2007
Check out EC series on RH Reality Check!
The fantastic blog RH Reality Check has a great series on emergency contraception in honor of the year anniversary of the FDA's approval of the drug for over-the-counter sale. Our own Nancy Keenan even weighs in:
August 24 marks the one-year anniversary of the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) long-delayed approval of over-the-counter sales for the emergency contraceptive known by its brand name Plan B®. Quick refresher: Emergency contraception (EC), if taken within 72-120 hours after sex, can significantly reduce a woman's chance of becoming pregnant. EC does not cause abortion; rather it works like other hormonal birth control to prevent pregnancy. For the 98 percent of American women who use some form of contraception during their lives, this is basic, essential health care.
So make sure to check it out!
Posted by Jessica at 3:41 PM | Comments (0)
August 23, 2007
Rev. Irene Monroe on Emergency Contraception
![]()
Contributed by Rev. Irene Monroe
The Food and Drug Administration’s approval for over-the counter sales of emergency contraception (EC) a year ago was just a beginning victory for women in this country in terms of reproductive justice. Why? Because when the fault lines of race, class, and geographical location contribute to some of the existing discriminations and disparities marginalized populations of women confront, the politics of “choice” are never as simple as the perception of it being merely a matter of public versus private domain. Accessibility to the drug also becomes a factor where obtaining EC is as difficult as obtaining an OB/GYN appointment.
In African-American communities – urban and rural – across the country, information about EC and its accessibility is negligible. Those women and communities that do know about EC face an uphill battle either finding pharmacies in their communities that carry EC, or finding informed and culturally competent pharmacists and staff that dispense the drug.
African-American women, who are besieged by a cultural iconography of black female sexuality that is wild and wanton, face a distorted reality. As a consequence, they have high rates of sexual abuse and assaults (but low rates of reporting them), have the highest percentage of unintended pregnancies, and have the highest number of uninsured and underinsured population of women in the country.
EC would greatly reduce the number of unintended pregnancies in the African-American community by affording women reproductive autonomy to invest in their health intervention and prevention care.
Reproductive justice is about access to information and the choices afforded to women. But without a multicultural and multifaceted EC awareness campaign to educate women about the drug and make it more easily accessible to them, a marginalized population of women will not have the choice to decide when they will or will not bear children. This has always been of crucial concern for African-America women, from slavery to present-day. Having control of their bodies and decisions that would provide them with the best self-care makes African-American women savvy health-care consumers and powerful health advocates for the entire community. Over-the-counter EC made accessible in black urban and rural communities across the country would be one commitment in the health care system to closing the health care gap that exists for African-American women.
The Reverend Monroe is an ordained minister, religion columnist, public theologian, and motivational speaker. As an African American feminist theologian, she speaks for a sector of society that is frequently invisible. As a nationally renown activist, scholar/ and public theologian her writings have appeared in the Boston Globe, the Boston Herald, the Bay State Banner, Black Commentator, and Metro News. She's a doctoral candidate at Harvard Divinity School.
Posted by Blog for Choice at 3:39 PM | Comments (0)
August 22, 2007
The Missed Opportunity of OTC
The fight to put emergency contraception over the counter was a huge one, and should be considered a victory for the women’s rights movement. Presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton can be credited with the political maneuvering that forced the FDA to consider the proposal from the makers of Plan B, which had been stalled for years, for seemingly political reasons. For a tool that works best when it can be administered quickly, it makes entire sense to remove each and every barrier to its access.
Unfortunately, there is still a downside to making EC accessible simply through a pharmacist. As Priscilla and Susan have pointed out — the issues change drastically when we’re talking about the more marginalized populations — low-income women, young women, women of color, immigrant women. The downside I’m talking about here applies to women who don’t have regular access to gynecological health care. This could be a woman with no health insurance, a young woman who is afraid to tell their parents she is sexually active, or a woman who can’t find a provider who speaks her language. Or it could be a woman who doesn’t know or understand the importance of routine gynecological care. For these women, each visit with a provider is crucial. Pap smears to test for pre-cancerous cells on the cervix, routine STI testing, long term birth control, not to mention general discussions about sexual and reproductive health are all necessary to keep her healthy and well-informed.
Logically, a woman going to purchase EC has most likely just had unprotected sex. Not only is she at risk for an unintended pregnancy, but also STI exposure. She also might need to have a conversation to re-evaluate her birth control method. When a woman no longer has to see a provider in this crucial moment, are we missing an opportunity for her to interact with a doctor and receive important medical care?
These issues are only pertinent in a broken health care system. Ideally, everyone would have access to affordable routine medical care, a provider that they trusted and visited regularly, with a focus on prevention of long term health problems. Then if a woman needed EC, she could go to a pharmacy and we wouldn’t have to worry that she may be missing an opportunity to receive much needed medical care. As reproductive health and rights advocates, we need to keep these issues in mind, and push even harder for services that allow all women to access regular gynecological care — government assistance programs, community health centers and clinics that provide services at low cost. We have to share the message that regular health care is crucial, and we won’t have a healthy community without it.
Miriam Perez is the Advocacy Coordinator at the National Latina Institute for Reproductive Health. She also blogs at Radical Doula.
Posted by Blog for Choice at 1:06 PM | Comments (0)
August 21, 2007
Are we leaving low income women behind? The reality of EC access under Medicaid
Contributed by Susan Berke Fogel, J.D.
The differences between real over the counter access to Plan B and the “behind the counter” status approved by the FDA are truly significant. But for low-income women who depend on Medicaid for their health care, those distinctions are meaningless because most of them still need a prescription to get EC. It’s hard to overstate what a tremendous barrier getting a prescription can be, especially for low income women – it may be an extra trip to a physician or waiting in line at a clinic; it could mean additional costs in clinic visits, child care, lost work, or transportation. All within 72 to 105 hours.
The Medicaid program served 7.1 million women of reproductive age (15–44) in 2003 according to the Guttmacher Institute. Under Federal Medicaid law, states can decide whether or not to cover prescription drugs – all 50 states do, and whether to cover over the counter drugs - generally all require a prescription for over the counter drugs. States also have the authority to limit access to drugs through utilization controls such as requiring prior approval of a drug from the state Medicaid agency before the pharmacist can fill the prescription – problematic for a drug that has to be taken within a short time frame; limiting the number of prescriptions – for example, Utah allows only 2 prescriptions for EC per year; and cost-sharing – which fortunately does not apply to family planning services and supplies. States also are required to cover “family planning services and supplies” but they have a lot of leeway in which services and supplies they choose to cover.
Most states covered emergency contraception when it was prescription-only, and since the FDA announcement, Plan B generally is still available with a prescription in those states. Georgia, however, now only covers Plan B for teens 17 and younger, but not for adults; Mississippi has explicitly excluded Plan B from coverage. Several states have announced that they currently or in the future will make EC available without a prescription through their state Medicaid programs including Illinois, Hawaii, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Oklahoma, Oregon, and Washington. The nine states that have Pharmacy Access Programs (also known as collaborative agreements that allow pharmacists to dispense EC) allow women who need prescriptions to get EC directly from a pharmacist.
The National Health Law Program has just released "Over the Counter or Out of Reach: A Report on Evolving State Medicaid Policies for Covering Emergency Contraception." This guide is an important tool that low-income health advocates and reproductive health advocates can use together to demand Medicaid coverage of Plan B without a prescription in their states. It provides a clear overview of how Medicaid allows for coverage of EC, a 50-state survey of EC and over the counter drug coverage policies, and resources to find out specifically which policies in your state govern Medicaid coverage of EC. We have a real opportunity to make easy access to emergency contraception a reality for all women. It’s time to stop leaving poor women behind.
Susan Berke Fogel, J.D., is a Consultant on Reproductive Health and Rights to the National Health Law Program (NHeLP), a national public interest law firm that seeks to improve health care for America's working and unemployed poor, minorities, the elderly and people with disabilities.
Posted by Blog for Choice at 1:52 PM | Comments (1)
August 20, 2007
Priscilla Huang on Plan B!

Contributed by Priscilla Huang
Its been one year since the Food and Drug Administration ran out of delay tactics and grudgingly approved Plan B for over-the-counter sale to adults 18 and older. For the first time since emergency contraception (EC) was introduced on the market, women and men can simply go to their neighborhood pharmacy, including Wal-Mart's, and purchase Plan B without the hassle of obtaining a prescription beforehand.
Sounds simple enough, right? In reality, your ability to access Plan B depends on who you are and who you ask. That’s because a combination of state laws, pharmacist refusal clauses, cost and insurance barriers, and pharmacy store practices can make a trip to the pharmacy quite unpredictable. This rings especially true for teens, low-income women, and women of color. Immigrant women also face additional barriers to access that ultimately renders this contraceptive option meaningless for many.
Like all women, Asian and Pacific Islander (API) women have sex. However differences in language and culture discourage many API women and girls from fulfilling their reproductive health care needs, including timely access to Plan B. For example, many young API women and girls are uncomfortable discussing issues related to their sexual health with their families or health care providers. As a result, many API women and girls have a limited understanding about their bodies and their reproductive health care choices, including emergency contraception. A study conducted in California found that 67% of South and Southeast Asian women aged 18 to 44 had no knowledge of EC.
Language differences also create barriers to access. Despite legal requirements and the capacity to do so, many pharmacies do not provide translated materials. This is problematic because individuals who require interpreters already receive fewer preventative services and often leave medical appointments without truly understanding their prescriptions. In one study, researchers concluded that language barriers exacerbated misconceptions that Vietnamese American women had about birth control pills, and prevented them from receiving accurate information about the range of contraceptive options.
These patterns are troubling because they suggest that API women are already undereducated and underserved when it comes to their reproductive health. Thus, making Plan B available over-the-counter is not enough to make EC a viable option for many API women. In addition, purchasing Plan B requires a showing of identification for proof of age. Although the ID requirement sounds innocent enough, many immigrant women do not have government-issued identification and would therefore have to obtain a prescription to access Plan B. Except if you’re Canadian. Seriously. The Drug Enforcement Administration recently published a list of acceptable forms of ID to purchase cold medicines that also have an 18 and over age requirement. Many pharmacies have adopted this list as a guideline for monitoring the adult sale of Plan B. Notably, a “driver’s license issued by a Canadian government authority” is the only foreign driver’s license listed as an acceptable form of ID. The DEA’s decision to recognize drivers’ licenses from Canada and not from other countries unfairly creates barriers for certain groups of immigrants and not for others.
We have much to celebrate on the one year anniversary of the FDA’s approval of Plan B. But it’s clear that there’s also a lot of outreach and advocacy that needs to be done to make Plan B truly accessible to all women and girls.
To learn more about NAPAWF or the range of reproductive justice issues affecting API women, please visit us at www.napawf.org.
Priscilla Huang is the Policy and Programs Director at the National Asian Pacific American Women’s Forum (NAPAWF). NAPAWF works to advance social justice and human rights for APA women and girls, and is the only national multi-issue women of color organization in the country.
Posted by Jessica at 1:09 PM | Comments (1)
July 30, 2007
Anti-choice pharmacists sue over...having to do their job
Extremist anti-choice pharmacists are suing Washington state over a new regulation that requires them to sell emergency contraception. You know, do their job.
In a lawsuit filed in federal court Wednesday, a pharmacy owner and two pharmacists say the rule that took effect Thursday violates their civil rights by forcing them into choosing between "their livelihoods and their deeply held religious and moral beliefs.""The stakes really couldn't be much higher," plaintiffs' attorney Kristen Waggoner said.
The state ruled earlier this year that druggists who believe emergency contraceptives are tantamount to abortion cannot stand in the way of a patient's right to the drugs.
This is just so upsetting. A woman's medical decisions are between her and her doctor--a pharmacist has no right to deny women access to medication.
Posted by Jessica at 11:03 AM | Comments (1)
March 21, 2007
CT legislator reveals rape in support of EC
I'm a bit late on this one, but it's worth reporting.
Connecticut State Rep. Deborah Heinrich (D-Madison) has been a strong advocate for emergency contraception for rape victims in Connecticut. Yesterday, in a press conference that preceded hearings on the Compassionate Care for Rape Victims Act, shared with the press and her colleagues that she had been a victim of rape and wanted to ensure that other rape victims would not have to live with the fear of pregnancy following rape because some hospitals refused to carry emergency contraception.
This was the first time that Heinrich had shared her story--with the publicly or her family. I'm pretty in awe of her bravery, I have to say.
Video news coverage of the story after the jump.
Posted by Jessica at 2:31 PM | Comments (0)
February 26, 2007
EC bill fails in South Dakota
A South Dakota bill, which would have required hospitals to tell rape victims about the availability of emergency contraception—that’s right, just tell women about it, not dispense it—failed last week.
Supporters of the bill tried unsuccessfully in the House Health and Human Services Committee to remove a "conscience clause" from the measure. That would let any health care provider or facility opt out of giving the information.…The amendment to remove the conscience clause failed on a 6-7 vote, and another amendment that would let just doctors or other health care workers opt out also failed.
Rep. Mark Kirkeby, R-Rapid City, said, "In all honesty, with [the conscience clause] being in place in this bill, there's no sense in even having this bill.”
I’d say so.
Posted by Jessica at 10:16 AM | Comments (0)
January 30, 2007
Rape victim thrown in jail, denied EC
You've got to love a system that allows a rape survivor to be thrown in jail after reporting the assault.
A young woman was raped by a man who grabbed her as she was walking to her car from a local parade. After she called police and reported the crime, it was discovered that she had an arrest warrant out for her.
It was from an arrest when the woman was a juvenile and she was accused of not paying restitution. The woman says she was not aware there was a warrant out for her, and her attorney says it appears to be a paperwork error."They were more interested in prosecuting her for something that's a paperwork snafu from four years ago, that was juvenile. They were more interested in working on that than finding an experienced rapist," stated the victim's mother.
Still, the woman was put in handcuffs and taken to jail. She was not allowed bond, and the medical staff at the jail refused to give her the Morning After Pill even though it had been prescribed at the hospital.
Apparently the medical supervisor at the jail wouldn't allow her to take EC because it was against her religion.
"So, here we have a medical supervisor imposing her beliefs on a rape victim," said attorney Virlyn Moore. "As a human being, how someone could be so violated by this monster and then the system comes along and rapes her again psychologically and emotionally - it's outrageous and unconscionable."
The young woman was arrested on a Saturday, and wasn't able to leave jail until Monday afternoon. After being raped. Just sit on that one for a while. Unbelievable.
Via Feminists to the Rescue.
Posted by Jessica at 10:50 AM | Comments (7)
December 14, 2006
MA hospitals violating emergency contraception law
A survey by NARAL Pro-Choice Massachusetts says that some hospitals are failing to offer EC to rape victims, as required by law.
The survey, which is due to be released today, indicated that officials at 7 percent of the hospitals with emergency rooms contend the provision for emergency contraception may be left to the doctor's discretion. Another 7 percent indicated that such provisions were contingent upon the woman undergoing a rape exam.
NARAL conducted the survey by having a rape counselor make mock calls on behalf of a fictitious rape survivor, asking if EC was available.
All nine Catholic hospitals surveyed said they offered emergency contraception "in some capacity" to rape victims, but 56 percent had serious limitations, according to the survey. The limitations include requiring a woman to undergo a rape examination and offering the contraception only at a doctor's discretion, [executive director of NARAL Pro-Choice Massachusetts Melissa] Kogut said.
Lovely.
Liza Sirota White of the Massachusetts Coalition Against Sexual Assault and Domestic Violence said, "It is outrageous that a rape survivor seeking to prevent pregnancy would be forced to undergo a sexual assault evidence collection kit exam in order to receive treatment.”
Kogut added that the policies “are problematic because they leave open the possibility that a rape survivor may not have access to [emergency contraception] at a particular hospital…Women who have been raped should not have to worry about which hospital they go to.” No joke.
Posted by Jessica at 12:48 PM | Comments (1)
December 13, 2006
Over-the-counter Plan B: The First Month
It's been a month now that Plan B has been available without a prescription for women over 18 years old.
I'm just wondering if anyone has any stories about obtaining (or trying to obtain) EC since it became available over-the-counter. I'm especially curious because I've gotten several emails from women who were turned away by their pharmacist or straight up lied to about its over-the-counter status. One woman in Georgia who contacted me was even told by her pharmacist that even though the FDA approved OTC sale of Plan B, the state legislature now had to okay it. Not true.
So let's hear your stories about Plan B: the good, the bad, the ridiculous.
Posted by Jessica at 11:38 AM | Comments (1)
September 18, 2006
Ohio op-ed says give teens EC
Check out this op-ed in Ohio’s The Enquirer, Let teens use emergency contraception.
Becki Brenner, president and chief executive officer of Planned Parenthood's Southwest Ohio Region, says that teens “need accurate information and timely access to a medication that will safely and easily protect them from childbearing at an early age.”
Women who have been the victims of rape or incest, or whose birth control method may have failed, now have a second chance to control their own lives.
But the FDA, under political pressure, excluded this access to teens 17 years old and younger. Plan B has been proven a safe and effective way to reduce unintended pregnancies and abortions among all women, including teens.
The U.S. has the highest rate of teen pregnancy among industrialized nations. Shouldn't we be doing all we can to make sure that teens have access to emergency contraception?
Yup. But what to do when conservative forces think that EC will make girls promiscuous? It’s ridiculous logic, but it’s something that resonates with parents. Thoughts?
Posted by Jessica at 12:28 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack
August 29, 2006
I heart Vermont
Vermont teens will be able to get emergency contraception over-the-counter despite the FDA’s decision to only provide the drug to adults.
The FDA ruled on Thursday that Plan B, also known as "the morning-after pill," can be sold to women 18 and older without a prescription, but women 17 and younger must still get a doctor's prescription to get the drug.Nancy Mosher, president and chief executive of Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, said Vermont legislation passed this year set up a third track for acquiring the drug, aside from getting a doctor's prescription or purchasing medicine over the counter.
The bill set up a "collaborative practice" process allowing pharmacists who receive special training to dispense Plan B to women without a prescription. Physicians would issue the pharmacists "standing orders" allowing them to dispense the medication to women who fill out a health screening questionnaire.
This means that that women in Vermont who are 18 or over can go with the FDA ruling allowing them to get EC over-the-counter, and women who are under 17 can just take advantage of this new law. So everybody wins.
And this is why I heart Vermont.
Posted by Jessica at 11:09 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack
August 25, 2006
Listen Up
NPR had a segment yesterday on the FDA’s approval of over-the-counter access to emergency contraception.
Listen to it here.
Posted by Jessica at 11:05 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
August 24, 2006
Getting personal
Despite my disappointment about the whole age-limit thing, I just want to say that the news that EC would finally be available over-the-counter really just made my day. It’s so difficult sometime to do this work--in the face of all the opposition and bad science and bad politics. Days like this make it worthwhile. This is a huge win for women and our health.
If anyone wants to share thoughts on this fab news, please go for it in comments. We deserve some rejoicing every once in a while, after all!
Posted by Jessica at 3:13 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack
EC will be available over-the-counter to women over 18
A victory for women, not so much for teens.
Women may buy the morning-after pill without a prescription -- but only with proof they're 18 or older, federal health officials ruled Thursday, capping a contentious 3-year effort to ease access to the emergency contraceptive.Girls 17 and younger still will need a doctor's note to buy the pills, called Plan B, the Food and Drug Administration told manufacturer Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Lets remember that the drug has been proven safe for women of all ages,
and that it’s young women who need easy to EC the most. But, enough
with the negativity--we finally got an answer, and that’s something to
be super happy about.
Nancy Keenan, president of NARAL Pro-Choice America, says “Finally, the FDA put sound science before politics and
made this safe, effective birth-control option more accessible to
women,” said Keenan. “The American public overwhelmingly supports
increased access to the ‘morning-after’ pill as a way to prevent
unintended pregnancy and reduce the need for abortion. “
And really, it’s about damn time.
Posted by Jessica at 10:10 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
August 15, 2006
Illinois Governor support EC without a prescription
Gov. Rod Blagojevich announced last week
that he’ll make EC available over-the-counter even if the FDA doesn’t.
“Plan B is a safe and tested form of emergency contraception, and women deserve access to it,” he said in a press release.
His opponent in the upcoming election, Republican Judy Baar Topinka, says she supports the sale of EC without a prescription--but only to women of a certain age. Yawn.
You may remember that Gov. Blagojevich has already shown support for EC by requiring pharmacists in his state to fill women’s prescriptions--even if their “conscience” doesn’t want them to. (You know, the kind of conscience that says premarital sex is for sluts.)
Posted by Jessica at 10:29 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack
August 14, 2006
Plan B...but not for all of us
Ellen Goodman has a great column (shocker I know) up about the bittersweeet news that the FDA is set to approve over-the-counter sale of emergency contraception.
While it’s nice to finally have some movement on the issue, this doesn’t really feel like a win. Young women--perhaps the folks that need EC most--won’t have access.
...First, a cowed and politicized FDA told the manufacturer to reapply, restricting the pills to 16 and over. Then, more than a year later, one acting FDA commissioner upped the age up to 17. Now the newest acting FDA commissioner, Andrew von Eschenbach, has pushed the age up to 18.
While I suppose we should be grateful that he didn't push it to menopause, why exactly did the would-be commissioner pick 18? Was there some new data? A new study perhaps? The most that any senator could get out of him at the confirmation hearings on his appointment was pretty cryptic: "I believe 18 is appropriate.'' With that, von Eschenbach won the title of "The Believer'' to match his friend and president, "The Decider.''
Scary, I know. Since when is “belief” supposed to inform science? In any case, check out the whole article; it’s a great read. Then take some action.
Posted by Jessica at 8:39 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack
August 8, 2006
Quick Hit: Editorial on EC
Check out this op-ed from The Philadelphia Inquirer on all of the FDA/EC madness.
"We all know what's going on here," Sen. Tom Harkin (D., Iowa) said at last week's confirmation hearing. "It is a disregard of science for ideological reasons."
Yeah it is--now why won’t someone do something about it!
Posted by Jessica at 11:42 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
August 3, 2006
Women unaware of emergency contraception
Ann at Feministing points to the somewhat shocking results of a survey about women's knowledge about emergency contraception:
* Only one in five women knows about EC.
* One-third of those women confuse Plan B with RU-486, the abortion pill.
* Less than 8 percent of women really understand how EC works and when it should be used.
Depressing, I know.
Posted by Jessica at 9:18 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack
June 21, 2006
American women going to Canada for Plan B?
Sales of emergency contraception (Plan B) in Canada have doubled
since last year when the drug was made available over the counter. And
it’s looking like American women may be a driving force behind the sales spike.
Duramed Pharmaceuticals Inc. , Plan B's Canadian manufacturer , sold 23,000 pills to retail pharmacies in January 2005. Now, 41,000 pills are sold by Canadian pharmacies each month, according to figures released yesterday by DoctorSolve Healthcare Solutions , a company that sells drugs through its website....Judith Soo, a University of British Columbia assistant professor who is conducting an economic evaluation of emergency contraceptive use, said...“In Canada, women do not require a Plan B prescription from a physician to obtain treatment. It can be obtained directly upon request from a trained pharmacist...As many states border on Canadian provinces, it is likely that women obtain Plan B treatments by crossing the border or through Internet pharmacies. It is not possible to quantify this number.”
Women in the Southern states are also going to Mexico to get EC. Thanks, FDA. Way to make preventing unwanted pregnancies and abortion so easy.
Posted by Jessica at 9:39 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack
June 8, 2006
Michigan bill would ban over-the-counter EC
This is some crazy shit. A bill in the Michigan house would ban over-the-counter availability to emergency contraception--even if the FDA approves it!
Preemptive anti-choicing...they are unbelievable.
Posted by Jessica at 8:28 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
June 5, 2006
Judge dismisses lawsuit by extremist pharmacist
Nothing like good news on a Monday.
A judge ruled last week that WalMart acted appropriately by firing a pharmacist who refused to serve clients seeking birth control. And it’s out favorite anti-choice pharmacist: Neil Noesen
Nice guy, huh? Excuse me if I don’t feel bad for him.
Posted by Jessica at 11:21 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
June 1, 2006
Oh, Rod...
How I love you sometimes. Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich, who filed a rule last year that Illinois pharmacies “must accept and fill prescriptions for contraceptives without delay,” is taking further steps to stop extremist pharmacists.
"It deals with contraceptives because that's the one we've had trouble with," said Susan Hofert, spokesman for the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation.
Love it. Women deserve to know that they have the right to their birth control--it’s just sad that we need measures like these.
Posted by Jessica at 10:16 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack
May 25, 2006
Medical journal urges US to increase EC access
The Lancet, a leading international medical journal, is calling on the FDA to stop trumping politics over science and allow over-the-counter access to EC.
"His failure to issue a decision undermines both his credibility and that of the agency. Von Eschenbach should move quickly to approve Plan B to show he has the independence needed to be an effective leader of the FDA," the editorial said.
"The agency is stalling, apparently to avoid offending antiabortion supporters of President Bush, who claim that the contraceptive is an abortifacient," it added.
Which of course, it isn’t. We’re still waiting, FDA....
Posted by Jessica at 9:41 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
May 12, 2006
Secret White House meeting on Plan B?
This is a whole truckload of crazy.
The White House has almost never consulted with the FDA during a drug approval process, but the Center for Reproductive Rights has found out about some shady business concerning Plan B and the Bush administration.
Yesterday, Bonnie Jones, an attorney for the reproductive rights group, told federal Magistrate Viktor Pohorelsky: "It has come to our attention that Mark McClellan at some point had a meeting with someone from the White House about Plan B." McClellan, now administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, worked as senior policy director for health care in the Bush White House in 2001 and 2002.A copy of McClellan's appointment calendar while he was FDA commissioner contains an April 21, 2003 entry: "Conference call w/Jay Lefkowitz re: Plan B submis." The entry appears to refer to an application for non-prescription sales submitted to the FDA a few days earlier by Women's Capital Corp., which then owned Plan B. Barr Laboratories of Pomona, N.Y., later bought the company.
Lefkowitz, popular with conservative groups, is the former deputy assistant to the president for domestic policy and now serves as special envoy on human rights in North Korea.
Jones was in court trying to recover deleted FDA emails and permission to depose five FDA officials; Assistant U.S. Attorney Franklin Amanat asked Pohorelsky to block Jones’ request. Lester Crawford has also refused to deposed--his lawyer says he plans to invoke his Fifth Amendment rights.
This is a pretty big deal. So why are we only seeing this story in New York Newsday?
Posted by Jessica at 4:35 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack
May 9, 2006
Doctors support emergency contraception with new initiative
A new campaign sponsored by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists is educating women on emergency contraception and urging them to obtain an advance prescription of the drug.
The goal is to encourage doctors to ask women of childbearing age if they would like an advance prescription for the morning-after pill "at every visit," said Dr. Douglas Laube, ACOG's president-elect and chair of the ob-gyn department at the University of Wisconsin, Madison. That way, if a woman has unprotected sex or contraception fails, she can take steps to prevent an unwanted pregnancy.
Naturally, the campaign is catching a lot of flak from anti-choicers
who call it “irresponsible.” But what could be more responsible than
having a form of back-up birth control just in case?
ACOG President Michael T. Mennuti says,
"With the Ask me. campaign, ACOG is stepping up our efforts to address
this country's high rate of unintended pregnancy. Nearly half (49%) of
the more than 6 million pregnancies that occur each year are
unplanned...Family planning is an important issue for our specialty,
and EC is an excellent contraceptive option for millions of women who
want to prevent an unintended pregnancy."
Mennuit continued that the campaign is particularly important because of the accessibility problem with EC. Many women can’t get to their docs in time (EC has to be taken within 72 hours of unprotected sex) and women who don’t have insurance may not have a regular doctor.
The doctor-led initiative was created in response to the FDA’s continued trumping of politics over science.
"Many of us feel the FDA's actions have been unfair, unkind, unconscionable, unsafe and biased," said Dr. Iffath Hoskins, chair of the ob-gyn department at Lutheran Medical Center in Brooklyn, N.Y.
Word.
Posted by Jessica at 9:06 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack
April 17, 2006
Colorado Gov. vetoes over-the-counter EC
Nothing like starting off your morning with more repro rights restrictions! Sigh. Colorado Governor Bill Owens vetoed a measure last week that would have allowed over-the-counter access to emergency contraception.
His reasoning sounds oh-so-familiar to New Yorkers:
Owens said the bill would have allowed minors to get emergency contraception without permission from a parent.“I believe it is irresponsible to allow minors to obtain emergency contraception without the counsel and guidance that could be provided by a doctor,” Owens said.
Sen. Betty Boyd, who was a sponsor of the measure, said she will try again next year to get the bill passed. Senate President Joan Fitz-Gerald said, “It is a sad day for women in Colorado. This very conservatively measured approach has been denied to women and their protection against rape. This veto is not in step with the voters of Colorado. To deny women the ability to decide, for themselves, what is in the best interest of their own reproductive health, hurts them during what is already a difficult time in their life.”
Posted by Jessica at 10:14 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
April 6, 2006
I (may) heart NY
I love my home state for so many reasons...but its history with access to emergency contraception is making it more and more difficult.
After Gov. George Pataki’s veto last year of a bill that would have made EC available over-the-counter (so teens couldn’t get it, which made no sense), new legislation came out that was said to address the governor’s concerns.
But, of course, it looks like nothing is really going to change:
"In all probability it will happen next year," he told the audience at Family Planning Advocates' annual conference.
Blah. I thought NY was supposed to be ahead of the game on choice?
Posted by Jessica at 10:21 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack
April 5, 2006
What a coincidence...I heart birth control, too!
Students from Ripon College in Wisconsin are selling “I heart birth control” shirts in response to anti-choice madness--the recent South Dakota abortion ban and a bill that would prohibit all University of Wisconsin campuses from dispensing emergency contraception. Love it.
Jordyn Rush, public relations chair for the Ripon Democrats and communications chair for the state party, is spearheading the shirts' sales on campus."What I've told a lot of people is that I agree with Bill Clinton's stance on [abortion]-that abortions need to be safe, legal and rare," says Rush. "If we promote birth control use then abortions will become more rare, but everyone still needs to have that option."
Rush hopes the shirts will increase the campus pro-choice message, one she feels has been voiced too softly this school year.
Good for them!
The proposed EC-ban comes from Rep. Daniel LeMahieu (Mr. Birth-Control-Makes-Girls-Whores) who started this nonsense after a UW-Madison health clinic ran ads in campus newspapers for emergency contraception.
Posted by Jessica at 10:45 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
April 3, 2006
Colorado EC bill goes to governor
The Senate in Colorado approved a measure last week that would allow over-the-counter access to emergency contraception--now it’s just just up to Gov. Bill Owens.
"In this case, we're going to have a drug that in certain instances can have significant side effects prescribed by a pharmacist without a doctor or their parents knowing," Owens said.
I like that the assumption is that young women will be the ones getting EC, but whatever. Let’s hope Owens does the right thing. Any folks from Colorado want to weigh in?
Posted by Jessica at 10:43 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack
March 22, 2006
Acting FDA Commissioner speaks out
Andrew von Eschenbach, a Bush family friend who was nominated by the president to head the FDA, said this weekend that he hasn’t been ideologically "restrained or constrained" by the administration.
So he’s anti-choice all on his own? I guess only time will tell.
Senators Patty Murray (D-WA) and Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) still plan to place a hold on a confirmation vote because of the FDA’s continued nonsense on over-the-counter status of emergency contraception.
Posted by Jessica at 10:21 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
March 17, 2006
NH rejects parental consent for EC
Always nice to see some good news.
The New Hampshire Senate rejected a bill yesterday that would have required teens to get their parents’ consent before buying emergency contraception.
So basically, a crappy anti-choice bill.
Senator Maggie Hassan said, “We allow minors in this state to get medical treatment for things like sexually transmitted diseases without their parents' consent, because as important as a parent's right to be involved in a child's medical care is, what is more important is a child's right to safety and health.”
Posted by Jessica at 11:27 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
March 16, 2006
Bush picks new FDA chief
The FDA drama seems to be never-ending, doesn’t it?
President Bush nominated Dr. Andrew C. von Eschenbach to serve as commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration on Wednesday, but a dispute over the "morning after" contraceptive pill all but ensures that the nomination will go nowhere for months or even years.A Bush family friend, Dr. von Eschenbach was appointed acting F.D.A. commissioner in September, when his predecessor abruptly resigned. He has led the National Cancer Institute since 2002 but now intends to resign from the institute, a spokeswoman said. With a nomination pending, Dr. von Eschenbach can lead the F.D.A. indefinitely.
Emphasis mine. I didn’t think it was possible to be any more pessimistic about the FDA and emergency contraception. Oh how wrong I was.
Posted by Jessica at 11:21 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack
March 13, 2006
New Hampshire “conscience clause” bill defeated
More good news out of New Hampshire.
First the state provided training sessions for pharmacists that would enable them to prescribe emergency contraception over-the-counter. Now the state House has rejected a bill that would have provided legal protection for activist pharmacists who refused to dispense emergency contraception.
Liza Dube, political director for NARAL Pro-Choice New Hampshire said of the decision, “The greater the access to emergency contraception, the smaller the number of women facing unintended pregnancy and the need for abortion...When states limit access to emergency contraception by allowing pharmacists to refuse to fill valid prescriptions, more women risk facing unintended pregnancy and the difficult decisions that go along with it.”
Posted by Jessica at 10:25 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
March 10, 2006
New docs raise questions about FDA’s handling of EC
New documents obtained by Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) reveal some pretty disturbing things about the FDA’s decision-making process on over-the-counter availability of emergency contraception.
The documents show that FDA policymakers had no problem with over-the-counter sales of EC in 2004, but that a year and a half later former FDA Commissioner Lester Crawford brought up concerns about teens:
...In a letter to acting FDA Commissioner Andrew von Eschenbach that was released Thursday, Waxman contends that the FDA "created a regulatory `Catch 22' to justify the predetermined political decision to block over-the-counter sales of Plan B."
"In essence, the agency was well aware of the regulatory questions that would arise when it suggested age restrictions, but simply did not resolve them in a timely manner," Waxman wrote. Waxman's office wouldn't disclose the source of the documents.
More to come as we get more info, but this is pretty interesting stuff...
Posted by Jessica at 10:36 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
March 3, 2006
Woo hoo! Wal-Mart will stock EC!
Wal-Mart has announced that all of its pharmacies will now stock emergency contraception. Unfortunately they won’t force pharmacists to dispense EC, but their policy says that pharmacists must refer clients to another pharmacy.
This is awesome news. By the way--NARAL Pro-Choice America supporters sent 31,176 petitions urging Wal-Mart to carry EC. Amazing.
Nancy Keenan said “Today's decision means the company is starting to get the message: Corporations should not decide what medicines women may or may not take.”
Posted by Jessica at 5:09 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
March 1, 2006
Over the counter EC in New York?
A new bill in New York could allow pharmacists to dispense emergency contraception without a prescription.
You may remember (if you’re from NY at least) that Gov. Pataki vetoed similar legislation last year because of a fear that younger women would have access to EC. Which was totally ass-backwards because there are no parental notification or consent laws in NY for abortion. So basically, a girl couldn’t prevent herself from getting pregnant, but she could terminate a pregnancy. Boggles the mind.
This new legislation is said to address most of Pataki’s concerns:
Pataki, a Republican who supports abortion rights, had said he wanted minors to see a physician first. He also said he wanted to limit the number of pills dispensed and to prohibit men from getting the pills to encourage unprotected sex....The amended legislation would allow pharmacists to dispense only a single dose at a time and only to women. Information about sexually transmitted diseases would also be made available and prescriptions could only be dispensed within the same county as the patient's residence. It does not set age limits.
Sounds pretty reasonable to me.
Posted by Jessica at 10:46 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
February 27, 2006
Emergency contraception battle takes to the states
The Washington Post has a great piece today on how the fight for access to EC is largely being fought on a state-level--mostly due to the inadequacy that is the FDA these days.
More than 60 bills concerning EC have already been filed in state legislature this year, some seeking to increase access and some seeking to limit it.
Shocking, I know.
Click here for a timeline of the FDA’s (non)action on emergency contraception and here for NARAL’s state profiles.
Posted by Jessica at 10:43 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack
February 17, 2006
Dems call out FDA on Emergency Contraception
The FDA’s acting director Andrew Von Eschenbach denied accusations that politics were trumping science in the agency’s foot-dragging over EC. Yeah, right.
"We know there is quite a bit of politics going on here," said Rep. Sam Farr, D-Calif.
...Rep. Rosa DeLauro, D-Conn., told Von Eschenbach not to let ideology supersede public health.
Von Eschenbach continued to make excuses for the FDA’s ridiculous actions. Click here for another take on the FDA’s priorities.
Posted by Jessica at 11:36 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
February 14, 2006
Breaking: Wal-Mart must stock emergency contraception
Love it. The Associated Press reports that Wal-Mart is now required to stock emergency contraception in Massachusetts. The decision--made by a state board that oversees pharmacies--comes after three women sued the company.
Happy Valentine’s Day!
Via Broadsheet.
Posted by Jessica at 4:51 PM
| Comments (0)
| TrackBack
February 6, 2006
Catholic hospitals deny EC to NY women
A new study by Catholics for A Free Choice reports that New York rape victims are routinely denied access to emergency contraception.
A spokesperson from the State Health Department, Robert Kenny, said told the Albany Times Union that there were five complaints of hospitals denying access to EC last year.
Yeah--but imagine how many women don’t make complaints. This is terrible news; I’m particularly annoyed because NY is my home state. Sigh.
Posted by Jessica at 2:34 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack
February 3, 2006
Vote in CNN poll on EC availability!
CNN is running a poll asking whether Wal-Mart should be required to stock emergency contraception. The poll is related to the recent suit brought by three Massachusetts women.
Go vote now!
Posted by Jessica at 4:16 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack
February 2, 2006
Women sue Wal-Mart over EC
It’s about damn time. Three women in Massachusetts are suing Wal-Mart, saying the company doesn’t stock emergency contraception which they are required to do by state law.
...The suit, backed by Planned Parenthood of Massachusetts, NARAL Pro-Choice Massachusetts and Jane Doe Inc., argues Wal-Mart is violating a state policy that requires pharmacies to provide all "commonly prescribed medicines." They are suing to force compliance with the regulation through the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act.
"Massachusetts pharmacies are required to stock all medications that are commonly prescribed to meet the usual needs of the community," Perkins said.
The three women who brought the suit were all turned away from Wal-Mart when they tried to buy emergency contraception.
Posted by Jessica at 10:47 AM | Comments (4) | TrackBack
January 31, 2006
Target responds to pro-choicers
Good news! After being inundated by pro-choice messages, Target now requires their pharmacists to sign a “conscience policy” agreeing to fill or refer prescriptions for emergency contraception.
Employees who refuse to sign are fired.
Way to take action!
Posted by Jessica at 3:19 PM | Comments (18) | TrackBack
January 18, 2006
Kentucky women push for access to EC
The Associated Press reports that women’s rights groups in Kentucky are pushing lawmakers to allow for over-the-counter emergency contraception.
The women are also fighting back against extremist pharmacists who won’t fill prescriptions for emergency contraception.
Added Rep. Mary Lou Marzian, D-Louisville: "I wish you would survey how many of those pharmacies carry Viagra and Cialis. You know every one of them have got that."
I hope they're successful, but all the recent rollbacks have me all pessimistic as of late. Sigh.
Posted by Jessica at 9:40 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
January 13, 2006
Illinois pharmacist refuses to dispense EC, lies to woman about availability
Figured we could all use a little break from the Alito madness. (Not that this is much better.)
A nurse in West Peoria, Illinois has filed a complaint against a Walgreen pharmacist for violating a state rule requiring pharmacies to fill EC prescriptions.
A spokeswoman at Walgreen's Deerfield headquarters said the company is looking into the matter.
This goes beyond a pharmacist refusing to dispense medication--this pharmacist lied to a customer. You may remember that earlier this year an Arizona pharmacist wrote into a newspaper about the EC controversy and recommended that pharmacists simply lie to women about having EC in stock. Is this becoming a commonly-used tactic of extremist pharmacists? (As BushvChoice pointed out before, it this kind of behavior doesn’t exactly keep in line with the pharmacist code to: "respect the autonomy and dignity of each patient" and "duty to tell the truth.")
Posted by Jessica at 10:37 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack
December 22, 2005
ACLU: Bush administration won't explain silence on EC
You probably remember that the first-ever federal guidelines for treating victims of sexual assault--put out by the Justice Department--didn’t even mention emergency contraception.
Well, apparently the Bush administration doesn’t want to explain why.
Melling said Wednesday there was no scientific or medical reason not to include emergency contraception in the guidelines aimed at helping the between 4,000 and 25,000 women annually who are estimated to become pregnant as a result of rape.
The ACLU, representing a large number of other orgs, sent a Freedom of Information Act concerning the guidelines after they heard that information on EC was taken out of the final draft. What they got back was troubling--all the information sent to the ACLU talked in detail about EC, making it clear that a deliberate decision was made to keep this info out of the final guidelines.
Posted by Jessica at 11:12 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack
December 21, 2005
Group sues to stop Illinois EC rule
The American Center for Law and Justice, founded by evangelist Pat Robertson, has filed a lawsuit to stop Illinois from requiring pharmacists to fill prescriptions for emergency contraception.
Grrr.
The rule, imposed by Governor Rod Blagojevich earlier this year, requires that pharmacies “must accept and fill prescriptions for contraceptives without delay.” Blagojevich also created a toll free number where women can report non-compliant pharmacies.
But the right-wing Christian organization is arguing that this violates pharmacists’ rights. (Women? Who are they?)
From the org’s website: Doctors, nurses and pharmacists should not be compelled to violate their conscience and participate in an abortion procedure.
Wow. I had no idea that women were looking for over-the-counter abortions! Please. (And don’t forget, a good number of these “conscience clause” pharmacists actually refused to fill prescriptions for birth control, not just emergency contraception.)
Posted by Jessica at 3:40 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack
December 19, 2005
NARAL Pro-Choice New Mexico takes on pharmacists
New Mexico is one of eight sates that allow over-the-counter status of emergency contraception, but pharmacists are allowed to refuse to fill EC prescriptions. Ah, the bullshit of it all.
Giovanna Rossi, executive director of NARAL Pro-Choice New Mexico, says that the state requires pharmacists who have objections to EC to refer clients to another store. But shocker--this doesn’t always happen.
Rossi said, “The problem is that we're finding that referrals are not being given on a consistent basis..."We're finding problems with the process, and we're looking into different ways we can address that.”
To address the problem, NARAL Pro-Choice New Mexico is investigating “a requirement that pharmacists who won't fill the prescription place signs in their windows with directions to the nearest pharmacy that will,” reports The Albuquerque Tribune.
Who knew a simple trip to the local pharmacy could turn into such a goddamn circus?
Posted by Jessica at 10:36 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack
December 12, 2005
Props to New Hampshire!
This weekend in New Hampshire about 200 pharmacists started training sessions that would enable them to prescribe emergency contraception over-the-counter. Woo hoo!
The state passed a law six months ago allowing emergency contraception to be sold over-the-counter by specially trained pharmacists; once these pharmacists complete their training, they need to partner with a nurse or doctor to complete the requirements.
Pro-choice organizations are hoping that EC will be more accessible as soon as next month.
Pharmacist Maureen Adams says, “There's a real need in the community...The earlier they receive it, the more effective it is. The pharmacy is the first link.”
Word.
Posted by Jessica at 10:27 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack
December 9, 2005
Romney changes position on EC; requires all hospitals to provide to rape victims
Wow. I didn’t see this one coming.
The decision overturns a ruling made public this week by the state Department of Public Health that privately run hospitals could opt out of the requirement if they objected on moral or religious grounds.
Romney had initially supported that interpretation, but he said yesterday that he had changed direction after his legal counsel, Mark D. Nielsen, concluded Wednesday that the new law supersedes a preexisting statute that says private hospitals cannot be forced to provide abortions or contraception.
''And on that basis, I have instructed the Department of Public Health to follow the conclusion of my own legal counsel and to adopt that sounder view," Romney said at the State House after signing a bill on capital gains taxes.
Interesting. After all his back and forth on emergency contraception recently, I never would have thought he would do the right thing. Because damn was that requirement needed--a 2004 report by NARAL Pro-Choice Massachusetts showed that a dozen Bay State hospitals that treat rape victims didn’t provide emergency contraception.
Whether Romney is a flip flopper or not doesn’t really concern me; I’m just pleased as punch that women in Massachusetts have a bit more choice today than they did yesterday.
Posted by Jessica at 12:03 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
December 8, 2005
Send a timer to the FDA!

What better way to tell them that time is up on Plan B?
This is great. The FDA has been delaying on emergency contraception’s over the counter status for four years--enough is enough.
Make a gift to support a woman's right to choose today, and we'll send a timer to FDA headquarters for every $10 raised.
If only we could throw the timers at them...
Posted by Jessica at 3:05 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
December 5, 2005
Missouri pharmacists placed on leave for refusing to fill prescriptions
The four cited religious or moral objections to filling prescriptions for the morning-after pill and "have said they would like to maintain their right to refuse to dispense, and in Illinois that is not an option," Walgreen spokeswoman Tiffani Bruce said.
A rule imposed by Gov. Rod Blagojevich in April requires Illinois pharmacies that sell contraceptives approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to fill prescriptions for emergency birth control. Pharmacies that do not fill prescriptions for any type of contraception are not required to follow the rule.
...Walgreen, based in Deerfield, Ill., put the four on leave Monday, Bruce said. She would not identify them. They will remain on unpaid leave "until they either decide to abide by Illinois law or relocate to another state" without such a rule or law. For example, she said, the company would be willing to help them get licensed in Missouri and they could work for Walgreen there.
Good for Walgreen--someone needs to hold these pharmacists responsible for their actions. They’re supposed to dispense medication, not politics.
Posted by Jessica at 10:02 AM | Comments (2) | TrackBack
November 21, 2005
Head of FDA’s Office Of Women's Health to start next month
After quite the controversy, the FDA seems to have finally gotten their act together regarding the new head of the agency’s Office of Women’s Health. After Susan Wood resigned in protest over the FDA’s trumping of politics over science in its decision process concerning Plan B, the agency first announced the position would go to Norris Alderson--a man trained as a veterinarian.
Understandably, women weren’t too pleased. The FDA then said that they had never announced anything about Alderson, despite the fact that an email announcing his appointment was sent to several women’s groups and that he was listed on a Health and Human Services directory as the acting director of the office. Mysterious stuff. Theresa A. Toigo, a 20-year veteran of the FDA, was then made acting director.
It seems that the FDA has finally made a decision as to who will take over the position permanently--Kathleen Uhl, who was most recently the supervisory medical officer in FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
I don’t know much about Uhl, but was glad to see that she had the support of Susan Wood:
Let’s hope she can bring some much-needed common sense and logic to an agency that seems to have anything but these days.
Posted by Jessica at 10:24 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
November 18, 2005
Keeping it real
I love love love this Chicago tribune editorial, The FDA's fiasco.
It’s about time someone talked some sense.
Enough.
The science is clear. The evidence is overwhelming that the morning-after pill is safe. It is most effective if taken within 24 hours of intercourse.
That's all the FDA needs to know.
...The FDA's mission is not to approve those drugs that are politically palatable but to ensure drugs are safe and effective. It's time for the FDA to return to that scientific mission and stop playing politics with Plan B.
Make sure to read the whole thing--it’s a doozy.
Posted by Jessica at 12:13 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
November 15, 2005
Lawmakers respond to GAO report
Thankfully, there was some action yesterday after the oh-so-shocking-news that the FDA didn’t for usual procedure in considering emergency contraception for over the counter status.
Representative Henry Waxman (D-CA) and 17 other lawmakers signed a letter to Health and Human Services Secretary Michael O. Leavitt saying that they were “deeply opposed to this subversion of science.”
The New York Times reports
that in addition, Sens. Hillary Clinton (D-NY) and Patty Murray (D-WA)
issued a statement saying the Plan B mess “was a politically motivated
decision that came down from the highest levels at the F.D.A.”
Well, duh.
Posted by Jessica at 10:59 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
November 14, 2005
The FDA is out to lunch
Love it.
NARAL Pro-Choice America just launched a “timer” clock to keep track of how frigging long the FDA has refused to act on Plan B’s over-the-counter status.
Nancy Keenan, president of NARAL Pro-Choice America, said “The clock is ticking on women’s patience in this country. The new GAO report’s revelations of political interference are the latest example of the Bush administration’s FDA putting politics before women’s health.”
Posted by Jessica at 4:39 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Government Accountability Office reviews the FDA
And they’re wondering about the same things we are.
The U.S. Government Accountability Office has just issued a report, "Decision Process to Deny Initial Application for Over-the-Counter Marketing of the Emergency Contraceptive Plan B Was Unusual." Ya think?
The report focuses on several different aspects of the FDA’s review process and notes that they were all out of the ordinary. Politics trumping science--you gotta love it.
Just a snippet from the overview:
Translation: What the hell were these people doing?
Posted by Jessica at 2:33 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
November 10, 2005
Shocker: FDA continues to stall
I know I should have seen this coming, but the constant put-offs are getting so tired:
The FDA received thousands of comments after it indefinitely postponed a ruling on Plan B in August and asked for public input, Dr. Scott Gottlieb, FDA deputy commissioner for medical and scientific affairs, said.
"It could take months to go through those comments," Gottlieb said at the Reuters Health Summit, held in New York.
And to devise an evil genius plan to stall yet again, I’m sure...
Posted by Jessica at 11:59 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
November 7, 2005
Forcing the FDA to take action
Love this. Four members of Congress introduced a bill on Thursday to force the FDA to decide whether EC can be sold without a prescription.
Reps. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.), Christopher Shays (R-Conn.), Joseph Crowley (D-N.Y.) and Jay Inslee (D-Wash.) sponsored the bill, which would automatically make emergency contraception available forover-the-counter sale 30 days after the bill's passage, until the FDA make a decision.
But of course, not all women would have access--women under 17 wouldn’t be able to buy EC without a prescription. You know, cause much better that teens get an abortion than prevent an unwanted pregnancy. Sigh.
Posted by Jessica at 10:22 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
October 24, 2005
Good news for women in Alaska
The Anchorage Daily News reports that the State Medical Board finally voted down a proposal last week that would have impeded access to emergency contraception by requiring a doctor’s appointment before obtaining EC.
...Right now, women can go right to a participating pharmacist to get the pills. The medical board's proposal would have required women to have a doctor's exam prior to getting the drug.
Dr. John Middaugh, longtime state epidemiologist, told the board on Thursday there's no medical or scientific justification for the change. The board's proposal would limit, if not eliminate, women's access to this drug, he said.
"We all know that nationally, politics have interceded," Middaugh said. "Please don't let the politics trump science and undermine the integrity of the state medical board."
Yay for Alaska! I needed something like this to put me in a better mood...
Posted by Jessica at 5:12 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Arizona rape victim denied EC
When it comes to emergency contraception, we need to remember that the political issues surrounding pharmacists and conscience clause laws affect women’s lives. It’s too easy to get caught up in discussions of legislation and politics--but this is about women.
This story out of Arizona is a good reminder of why we must ensure that women have access to emergency contraception:
While calling dozens of Tucson pharmacies trying to fill a prescription for emergency contraception, she found that most did not stock the drug.
When she finally did find a pharmacy with it, she said she was told the pharmacist on duty would not dispense it because of religious and moral objections.
"I was so shocked," said the 20-year-old woman, who, as a victim of sexual assault, is not being named by the Star. "I just did not understand how they could legally refuse to do this."
..."This (sex) was with someone I did not even know and did not want to have intercourse with, and I am in no place now to have children," she said. "I just don't think this should be the pharmacist's decision."
Posted by Jessica at 11:01 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack
October 6, 2005
Cheers!
Women’s eNews features Illinois Judge John Belz in their Cheers and Jeers section (he’s in the Cheers), and I couldn’t agree more:
The anti-choice law firm brought suit on behalf of two pharmacists who sought a temporary restraining order to prevent the state from enforcing the governor's order until the courts issued a final decision.
The order requires pharmacies that sell any type of prescription birth control to fill prescriptions for emergency contraception. If the pharmacy cannot fill the prescription because it is out of stock, it must now offer an alternative treatment, agree to order the drug or transfer the prescription to another pharmacy. Failing these, the pharmacist must return the prescription to the woman so she can have it filled elsewhere.
Kudos to Judge Belz!
Posted by Jessica at 4:02 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Another FDA resignation over EC
I wonder when they’ll get the hint. Jeez.
The Hartford Courant reports that in addition to Susan Wood, Dr. Frank Davidoff--former member of the FDA's Nonprescription Drugs Advisory Committee--has also resigned over the agency’s stalling on emergency contraception:
"I can no longer associate myself with an organization that is capable of making such an important decision so flagrantly on the basis of political influence, rather than the scientific and clinical evidence," Davidoff wrote, resigning as a consultant and former member of the FDA's influential Nonprescription Drugs Advisory Committee. "I'm truly sorry it has come to this, since the agency serves an extraordinarily important function, and I generally respect the staff and the work they do."
Davidoff notes in the article that the opposition to emergency contraception doesn’t really make much sense: “I keep trying to think about the opposition that came in after we voted on Plan B...Why would you oppose a pill that could dramatically cut back on abortions? It makes absolutely no sense.”
Make sure to check out the whole piece; it’s gives a good background of the whole issue.
Posted by Jessica at 10:29 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack
September 30, 2005
What do you know...
Yesterday, California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed legislation to legalize same-sex marriage. Not a good thing.
But...he also signed a measure to ensure that pharmacists can’t deny women emergency contraception. A very good thing!
I’m not exactly a fan of Schwarzenegger (as an actor or a politician), but I’ll take my victories where I can get them!
Posted by Jessica at 10:40 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
September 26, 2005
FDA Chief resigns; future of EC unknown
As many of you probably already know, Lester Crawford resigned last week as commissioner of the FDA. Now all that remains to be seen is if the FDA will continue to put politics above science.
Nancy Keenan noted that the resignation could serve as an opportunity for the FDA to rebuild its credibility and move forward to make emergency contraception available over the counter.
"Mr. Crawford's departure must not be used as an excuse for the FDA to continue to delay a decision on whether women will have over-the-counter access to the morning after pill...Crawford’s tenure is marred by the FDA’s failure to follow the recommendations of its scientific and medical advisory panels. The agency’s political leadership failed to take the opportunity to improve women's access to emergency contraception, which could prevent unintended pregnancies and reduce the need for abortion."
Posted by Jessica at 12:42 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
September 1, 2005
Quick hits: Coverage of FDA resignation
Check out all the media coverage of Susan Wood’s resignation from the FDA...maybe they’ll take a hint.
USA Today: FDA official quits over Plan B pill delay
LA Times: Women's Health Chief Quits FDA Over Delays on 'Morning After' Pill
The New York Times: Official Quits on Pill Delay at the F.D.A.
Associated Press: FDA Official Quits Over Plan B Pill Delay
Posted by Jessica at 3:18 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Groups request sexual assault guidelines
This week, the American Civil Liberties Union, along with NARAL and other repro rights groups, filed a Freedom of Information Act request related to the national sexual assault guidelines BushvChoice told you about some time ago.
These guidelines are the first-ever national model explaining post-sexual assault medical care, and they don’t include any reference to emergency contraception.
Yeah, I know—it’s insane.
"It is time for the Department of Justice to be accountable for refusing to do everything it can to protect sexual assault survivors from unintended pregnancy," said Louise Melling of the ACLU Reproductive Freedom Project.
The most important things for a survivor of sexual assault are to regain control and know all her options. Anything else is just wrong.
Posted by Jessica at 10:46 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
August 31, 2005
FDA Director of Women's Health resigns
Hmmm...I wonder why. Susan Wood, Director of the Office of Women’s Health and Assistant Commissioner for Women's Health, sent around the following email to her friends and colleagues:
I regret to tell you that I am leaving the FDA, and will no longer be serving as the Assistant Commissioner for Women's Health and Director of the FDA Office of Women's Health. The recent decision announced by the Commissioner about emergency contraception, which continues to limit women's access to a product that would reduce unintended pregnancies and reduce abortions is contrary to my core commitment to improving and advancing women's health. I have spent the last 15 years working to ensure that science informs good health policy decisions. I can no longer serve as staff when scientific and clinical evidence, fully evaluated and recommended for approval by the professional staff here, has been overuled. I therefore have submitted my resignation effective today.I will greatly miss working with such an outstanding group of scientists, clinicians and support staff. FDA's staff is of the highest caliber and it has been a priviledge to work with you all. I hope to have future opportunities to work with you in a different capacity.
Sincerely,
Susan
Kudos to her for taking a stand, but this still just makes me sad. I wonder what other fallout there will be over this...
Posted by Jessica at 12:01 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack
August 30, 2005
FDA Coverage
Check out some of the latest coverage on the EC/FDA craziness:
The New York Times: Morning-After Pill: Politics and the F.D.A.
Los Angeles Times: FDA Delays Ruling on 'Morning After' Contraceptive
USA Today: FDA abandons its standards
Bloomberg: FDA Delays Decision on Barr's `Morning After' Pill
Reuters: Regulators delay decision on Barr's 'morning after' pill
Associated Press: FDA Delays Decision on Morning-After Pill
CNN: Morning after pill will have to wait
NPR: Age Issues Delay FDA Ruling on 'Plan B' Pill
Posted by Jessica at 2:09 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
August 29, 2005
USA Today says FDA has abandoned its standards
In a Sunday editorial, USA Today blasted the FDA for yet another delay on Plan B.
Many pregnancies like those, and the awful choices they present, could be avoided if emergency contraception were easier to obtain.
Unfortunately, the Food and Drug Administration — in a blatant cave-in to political pressure from opponents of abortion rights at the expense of its own standards — said Friday it was indefinitely postponing a decision on whether the so-called morning-after pill could be dispensed without a prescription.
The editorial also points out that recent studies show increased access to EC doesn’t lead to riskier sexual behavior by teens. So there goes the whole what-if-teens-get-it argument.
Emergency contraception is already available in seven states over-the-counter (with no age restrictions). Of course, the problem of extremist pharmacists remains.
The fact that we’re still waiting for something so simple--and something that will curb the number of unintended pregnancies--is ridiculous.
Take action now.
Posted by Jessica at 3:09 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
August 26, 2005
Bushie breaks promise: FDA delays decision on emergency contraception
You have got to be kidding me.
From the Associated Press:
...The FDA will allow 60 days of public comment on how to take such a step and enforce an age limit.
Um, how about you don’t? Young women are the women who need EC the most.
President of NARAL Pro-Choice America, Nancy Keenan, had this to say:
“The Bush administration has broken its promise to the U.S. Senate and the American people to make this decision, after more than two years of stalling. FDA’s delay flies in the face of an American majority that believes more should be done to reduce unintended pregnancies and the need for abortion. Scientists, doctors, and Americans across the political spectrum support giving women, especially survivors of sexual assault, better access to the morning-after pill to prevent unintended pregnancies.”
Because, really--isn’t that what we all want?
Posted by Jessica at 5:13 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack
August 25, 2005
Stop stalling on Plan B
Check out this editorial from Wisconsin’s The Capital Times, Quit stalling on Plan B. Love it.
Three million women a year deal with an unintended pregnancy that might have been prevented in the first place with easier access to emergency contraception. We hope, for their sake, that the Food and Drug Administration breaks its willful pattern of succumbing to political pressure instead of following scientific advice.
Make sure to read the whole thing. And then go take action.
Posted by Jessica at 3:29 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
August 19, 2005
Over-the-counter EC in New Hampshire awaits compliance
This is annoying. You get a state law that allows pharmacists to dispense EC over-the-counter, but no one does it!
Also, potential action on the federal level has left state regulators with more questions than answers.
At the state Board of Pharmacy's regular meeting on Wednesday, the panel agreed to a proposed set of rules needed to govern how the new law is to be implemented. Seeing as those rules still need legislative approval, and a training program for pharmacists has yet to be finalized, it could be nearly two months before druggists are officially allowed to dispense the drug, known as the "morning after pill," to women without a prescription.
Ugh. I understand folks are waiting for the FDA decision, but women need access to EC now. Another downer--pharmacists don’t have to dispense it if they don’t want to. That’s right, it’s our old friend the so-called conscience-clause. Sigh.
Posted by Jessica at 11:34 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack
August 16, 2005
Illinois pharmacists must fill prescriptions for EC
It’s pretty sad that we need to force some pharmacists to do their jobs, but at least the women of Illinois can rest a little easier:
A legislative committee called the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules didn't object to the rule becoming permanent during a meeting today. It will be permanent when the rule is filed with the Secretary of State.
The rule says Illinois pharmacists that sell contraceptives must fill prescriptions for emergency contraception such as the morning-after pill.
One problem? Pharmacies that don’t fill prescriptions for any kind of contraception--like the birth control pill--don’t have to abide by the rule. So pharmacies can get around this simply by refusing to carry any contraception! (I wonder if condoms count...)
Posted by Jessica at 2:14 PM | Comments (7) | TrackBack
August 9, 2005
Over-the-counter access for EC on the way?
By month's end, federal health officials will decide whether to let women buy emergency contraception without a prescription _ and if so, if the morning-after pill will be treated more like aspirin off the shelf or like cigarettes.
Regardless of how the Food and Drug Administration ends the two-year saga, it isn't likely to settle the issue. States already are moving to expand access to Plan B, the pill that can prevent pregnancy if taken soon after unprotected sex, amid some competing efforts to restrict it.
And if the FDA does allow easier access, the pills probably would come with an age limit--anyone younger than 16 would still need a prescription. So drugstores would have to "card" young customers seeking to prevent pregnancy much as they now check cigarette buyers' ages.
How is unclear. Would morning-after pills sit next to other over-the-counter drugs or condoms?
Check out the whole article for what could happen if the FDA does approve Plan B for over-the-counter. (Keeping my fingers crossed...)
Posted by Jessica at 9:34 AM | Comments (14) | TrackBack
August 2, 2005
Pataki's veto angers both sides of debate
Guess he should rethink that presidential run...
Pataki’s veto seems to have pissed off everyone, but for different reasons of course:
Democrats and Republicans on Monday began a fierce attack on Gov. George E. Pataki's decision to veto a bill that would make the so-called morning-after pill available without a prescription and raised doubts about whether the legislation could be revived.
The criticism came a day after aides to Mr. Pataki said he would oppose the measure because it did not include any provisions that would prevent minors from having access to the drug. Mr. Pataki's aides said the governor would reconsider the measure if the Legislature made amendments to the bill that addressed his concerns
But Mr. Pataki's critics inside and outside the State Legislature sharply questioned the governor's motives, noting his long support for reproductive rights and suggesting that he was altering his position to win favor with national conservatives as he prepares for a possible bid for the Republican presidential nomination.
...If Mr. Pataki was hoping to win over national conservatives with his stand, he may have to think again. Connie Mackey, vice president for government affairs at the Family Research Council, a prominent national conservative group, said the governor had not gone far enough in arguing that the bill's main flaw was that it made the drug available to minors.
Sorry, George. Looks like you lost out on this one, huh?
Posted by Jessica at 12:32 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
August 1, 2005
Thank god we don't have to pretend we're in this to save babies anymore
By Amanda, Pandagon
I've noticed lately a reduction in the amount of pooh-poohing feminist fears that once a genuine ban on abortion is within the grasp of the Wingnutteria, they will dispense with the fakey concern about saving babies and proceed to attack contraceptive rights. Of course, that's because with the looming appointment of an anti-choice Supreme Court justice, a lot of "pro-lifers" are abandoning the pretense that they care about babies and jumping feet first back into the more comfortable territory of punishing women for having The Sex. This week's casulties are the students that attend University of Wisconsin schools, as the legislature there just passed a bill banning all schools from dispensing any kind of birth control. (The bill is aimed at banning emergency contraception from university health centers, but critics like Alice Reilly-Myklebust in her testimony before the Assembly Committee on Family Law contend that it will effectively ban health centers from prescribing any kind of hormonal birth control to female students, due to the vague wording of the bill.)
And they didn't even come up with a pseudo-compassionate argument to justify it. Not even a maudlin speech about the poor suffering sperm who either bonk their heads on condoms or manage to get to their destination to be crushingly disappointed not to find an egg there to fertilize. Just straight-up stick it to the sluts reasoning. Actually, I'm joking about the sperm bonking their heads. As you can imagine, the only people who are banned from obtaining birth control on campus are women, not men.
Wisconsin State Rep. Dan LeMahieu, R-Oostburg, introduced this bill based on the belief that "dispensing birth control and emergency contraceptives leads to promiscuity."
In reality, what contraception does for college age women is leads to getting that diploma without being encumbered by child-bearing. Perhaps that is what's really pissing off the legislators who passed this. After all, we have Rick "Man on Dog" Santorum cruising around the talk show circuit right now making it clear that he dislikes birth control precisely because it gives women the ability to limit their child-bearing so that they can have careers and lives outside of the home. The mask is coming off the "pro-life" movement and their real anti-woman goals are becoming easy to see.
Speaking of Santorum, I was thinking over that funny moment in his interview with George Stephanopaulos where he couldn't cough up the name of one "radical feminist" (Santorum is one of those conservatives who has almost surely never said the word "feminist" without the adjective "radical" attached to it) besides Gloria Steinam. We all laughed at how stupid Santorum is to write a book where he bitches and moans about the feminist movement when he doesn't know jack shit about it. All he knows is that women use birth control, get jobs, choose not to marry if they'd like or choose to divorce if their marriages aren't working out for them, and that pisses him off.
And then it occured to me that since Santorum was most likely thinking of the ordinary, non-activist women of this country, many of whom don't even refer to themselves as feminists, then that probably means that the beloved term "radical feminist" is one of those infamous conservative code words. I thought it meant any feminist at all, but now that I think about it, Santorum probably thinks any woman who doesn't eschew work in order to marry and pump out kid after kid is a radical feminist. Which is to say, the majority of women in this country.
Posted by at 3:14 PM | Comments (2) | TrackBack
Pataki and Romney play games with women's lives
Did you know that Governor Pataki of
For such games have a great reward for them: the support of right-wing fundamentalists. In this case the issue is whether the so-called morning-after pill should be available without prescription. Pataki and Romney, together with most of the wingnuts, think that this contraceptive should not be available over the counter. Why? Well, Pataki mumbles something about possible side-effects among young women, but here is the real answer:
The pill, which has been shown to be effective at preventing pregnancy if taken within 72 hours of unprotected sex, has been at the center of a national debate. It is classified as a contraceptive and acts in most cases by preventing ovulation or fertilization. Because it may also prevent a fertilized egg from implanting in the uterus, it has also become a flashpoint in the debate over abortion.
Never mind that proponents of the pill think its availability over-the-counter could prevent 80,000 abortions per year in
But it is still about women's lives.
Posted by at 11:15 AM | Comments (3) | TrackBack
July 28, 2005
Alaska puts off EC decision
Alaska is one of eight states where emergency contraception has over-the-counter status, yet that could all change.
The Alaska State Medical Board has recently proposed a change that would require women to have a prescription for EC, limiting its access. The proposal caused quite the uproar, with hundreds of letters being sent from around the state by concerned doctors, pharmacists, legislators and citizens.
Rep. Eric Croft of Anchorage wrote that the cost of a doctor’s exam would put an undue burden on some women. (Not to mention put a delay on how quickly women could access EC.)
In light of the strong responses, the board has put off a vote until September (the original deadline was July 11). We’ll keep you updated on this one. Any Alaskans out there want to weigh in?
Posted by Jessica at 10:22 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack
July 27, 2005
Quick Hit: Vaginal EC on the way
A new study shows that administering emergency contraception vaginally--rather than orally--is just as effective and may reduce levels of nausea and vomiting.
Sounds a little weird, I know...but the more options women have, the better.
Posted by Jessica at 12:45 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
