Palin, Sebelius, and the right to choose
Hold up, wait a minute. Could this possibly be true?
An online community of female supporters of Gov. Sarah Palin is launching a last minute campaign to derail the candidacy of Kathleen Sebelius for the secretary post at the Department of Health and Human Services.
Team Sarah, which was founded to support and mobilize for the McCain-Palin ticket and claims tens-of-thousands of members, blasted out a petition on Monday morning urging members to "flood the phone lines" in opposition to Sebelius' candidacy.
Look - I know some of you are tired of Palin talk (see the previous posts' comments to read what I mean). I get it - I'm tired of her, too. But she's out and about in the political arena, raising money for the Indiana Right to Life organization and its annual dinner. Ignoring her would be ignoring the threat she and other politicians like her pose to the right to choose.
Palin's speech has not gone unnoticed by mainstream media. NARAL Pro-Choice America political director Elizabeth Shipp responded:
Supporters of abortion rights said every woman deserves the chance to make her own choice. "If I didn't know any better, I'd say Governor Palin sounds remarkably pro-choice," said Elizabeth Shipp, political director at NARAL Pro-Choice America.
Indeed. Except we all know that Palin opposes legal abortion, even in cases of rape or incest.
Columnist Ruth Marcus had this take on Palin's speech:
I'd like to thank Sarah Palin for her bravery in explaining the importance of a woman's right to choose. Even braver, the Alaska governor made her eloquent case for choice at a right-to-life fundraising dinner...
[Palin said] I do understand what these women, what these girls go through in that thought process."
Except that, of course, if it were up to Palin, women would have no thought process to go through. The "good decision to choose life," as she put it, would be no decision at all, because abortion would not be an option.
Let's all take a moment to be thankful that Gov. Palin is not Vice President Palin - shall we?
I know I've ventured off track, but here's where I bring it all back to the Sebelius nomination. As I wrote above, Team Sarah, the online community of Palin's female supporters, is calling on its members to take on the Sebelius nomination as part of the "Not on Our Watch" project... because Sebelius is pro-choice. Never mind her years of experience. If Team Sarah sees fit to launch a campaign against the Sebelius confirmation, then I see fit to point out the hypocrisy of Palin's recent statements at the Indiana Right to Life dinner in conjunction with the "Not on Our Watch" project.
We must work to ensure Gov. Sebelius is confirmed. Her nomination went before the Senate Finance Committee for a vote today, and it passed by a vote of 15-8. Now, it will go on to a full Senate vote which could happened any day now.
NARAL Pro-Choice America, as part of our Three-for-Three campaign, is fighting to ensure that Gov. Sebelius is confirmed, because we know she is well qualified for this job:
- Gov. Sebelius has spent the last 20 years in public service, ensuring that Kansans are healthy and safe, first as a state representative and then as insurance commissioner.
- As governor, Sebelius has a strong record of protecting women's access to reproductive-health services and information.
- Her experience, extensive public service, and record protecting women's reproductive rights makes Gov. Sebelius a highly qualified nominee to serve as HHS secretary.
Take action NOW with NARAL Pro-Choice America and urge your senators to move forward on the confirmation of Gov. Kathleen Sebelius as secretary of Health and Human Services.

When Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah is quoted saying, "I regard human life to be sacred, and it troubles me to have someone with an apparent cavalier attitude toward life -- as well as a lack of candor on this important issue -- head our nation's health services," in regards to Sebelius, I get frustrated with the assumptions made (Werner). What about the fully developed life of a woman? Who actually has the cavalier attitude?
I think Ruth Marcus concluded her article well, saying, "As for those of us less certain that we know, or are equipped to instruct others, when life begins and when it is permissible to terminate a pregnancy, Palin's speech offered a different lesson: Abortion is a personal issue and a personal choice. The government has no business taking that difficult decision away from those who must live with the consequences" (Marcus).
You're absolutely right that a Palin speech response is warranted. She's a high-profile, national figure who was on her party's presidential ticket last year and continues speaking to anti-choice causes. NARAL is well-within its rights to respond; the content to which Ms. Shipp responds does indeed sound remarkably pro-choice.
However, my issue is with the nature of the response overall. You write: "Let's all take a moment to be thankful that Gov. Palin is not Vice President Palin - shall we?" From an issue perspective, of course NARAL is thankful. But from a fundraising perspective, NARAL and the entire pro-choice community would be much better off were Palin in the VP's office right now. And that, I think, is a big reason why her movements are so closely tracked and her speeches so closely monitored. Is it the biggest reason? Maybe, maybe not. But it ranks right up there.
And that, I believe, is indicative of a larger problem. The pro-choice community, especially over the past eight years, has become so used to responding against attacks that it spends too much time looking backwards and resurrecting the old opponents. It's why George W. Bush's face can STILL be seen on your homepage even as I type. Our supporters get complacent when the people we like are in office; they seem to mobilize most effectively only when things are going bad or they're scared that something is about to be taken away from them. The other side seems much more effective at speaking about and building on their successes than we are with ours.
The only way for that to change is for us to stop constantly talking about the past. 2012 is a long ways away, and there is a lot to accomplish before then. I'm sure Palin will make plenty of speeches over the next four years, but I'd much rather focus on what our side is DOING rather than what the other side is SAYING.
Is knowing “when life begins and when [the choice] is permissible to terminate a pregnancy” important in the abortion debate?