Rachel Maddow on Bush's HHS Rule
I'm one of the millions of people that adores the heck out of Rachel Maddow. It's true. Her weeknight show on MSNBC is a must watch.
So after a long, long day using Bush's dangerous rule as my motivation (though a holiday vacation is just days way), I was thrilled to pieces to see this segment on the Rachel Maddow show:
Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy
I love that the Rachel Maddow show gave this dangerous, divisive rule over seven minutes of airtime, and had pro-choice Rep. Diane DeGette (CO-01) as their guest for the segment. I think they did a great job of explaining the rule and showing just how broad and far-reaching this horrifying rule really is.
In today's Washington Post, Rob Stein has a great article about the rule which really demonstrated the focus of the opposing sides:
Donna Crane, policy director for NARAL Pro-Choice America, noted that Congress has a limited window to act. "Right now our efforts are focused on the executive branch."
The regulation's supporters, including some members of Congress, vowed to defend it.
"We will marshal a nonpartisan, grass-roots coalition to prevent any weakening of current conscience protections," said Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, a socially conservative group that opposes abortion.
David Stevens of the Christian Medical Association said: "We will do all in our power to ensure that health-care professionals have the same civil rights enjoyed by all Americans. These regulations are needed, do not change the law but simply stop religious discrimination
In other words, the anti-choice groups are going to give all they've got to make sure the rule stays in place.
Let's make sure we stay vigilant, shall we?

WTF is happening to my country? I'm so angered by this that I'm at a loss for words.
I think if I was a baby in the womb due to be butchered in whatever horrendous form that exists in the abortion 'clinic' I would cry out, NO, I want to live. What about THEIR choice? Or is it the case of 'might is right'?
Lisa, late-term abortions in which the fetus can be reasonably described as a baby, with an awareness of its (albeit very limited) surroundings account for approximately 1% of all abortions performed nationwide.
While I personally have ethical qualms about abortions at this point in the pregnancy, you really can't compare it to the vast majority of abortions, which take place only weeks into the pregnancy, when the fetus is only a cluster of cells with nothing resembling a mind or even a nervous system.