Bush v. Choice
Disclaimer About Jessica NARAL Pro-Choice America Contact Us

« AZ Gov. vetoes anti-choice bill | Main | Male contraception on the way »

April 27, 2006

Challenge to Roe a good thing?

Me thinks not, but Kartik Raghavan at The Seattle Times wants to hash it out. The argument that a challenge to Roe would get Americans more interested and politically motivated (especially on a local level) isn’t a new one. I guess I’m uncomfortable with it because it’s been used by some as a “pipe down, little ladies, don’t worry about choice” kind of thing in the past. As if we “give up” on choice for now, all will turn out well.

Regardless of one's views on Roe v. Wade, I believe the challenge to Roe will have a significantly positive, unintended consequence for the next generation of Americans, and for U.S. politics.

Over the long period since Roe, my generation has lived complacently; we knew the Supreme Court's ruling had set a boundary that the state legislatures could not cross. But with this complacency, we lost an interest in basic participation in local and state social issues — Lincoln's ideal of government by the people and for the people.

With the comfort afforded by Roe, I know many of my brightest and most talented friends often ignored participating in local and state politics (me, too), with the exception of fiscal issues...The escalating challenge to Roe v. Wade — with the spotlight potentially falling on local legislatures if the high court overturns its 1973 decision — hopefully will shake many of us out of our contentment and force us to realize we need to raise participation in grass-roots democracy — of the people, for the people, by the people — regardless of our political affiliations.

I’m sorry, but I don’t buy it. Especially because the assumption is that people have been complacent on abortion. I don’t know about Raghavan’s peers, but mine are seriously committed to issues of choice. This is an issue about women’s lives--not a political guinea pig.

Thoughts?


Posted by Jessica at April 27, 2006 11:47 AM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.blogforchoice.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/3039


Comments

Agreed -- I can't think of another time when a total loss has resulted in an awakening of the political counter-movement. Not to mention the uphill battle we'd be left with.


Posted by: Isaac Goldstein at April 27, 2006 4:17 PM

I agree also - I do however think that her point about her and her friends not being involved is very correct - I see that to be true with my peers...the women before us fought for so much and everything was pretty much handed to us...we can wear skirts, work out of the home, have opinions, freedom of choice....we have taken all of that for granted. I'm not saying I want Roe to get over turned - but I DO want women to stand up and be heard....because every friend that I have talked to not one of them knew what was going on in the states around us regarding issues against our bodies...and not one of us know where to start to get involved...and I have a feeling if we don't bad thing will be happening


Posted by: mj at May 2, 2006 3:38 PM