Supreme Court decision takes away tools to protect women from violent anti-choicers
The Supreme Court ruled today in Scheidler v. National Organization for Women that the federal racketeering and extortion laws can’t be used to stop anti-choice extremists from obstructing access to clinics, damaging property or using violence.
This case has been going on since 1986, when the National Organization for Women (NOW) brought a class action suit against anti-choice groups that had been violent and threatening in violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO).
Nancy Keenan, president of NARAL Pro-Choice America says that the decision “takes away a legal resource doctors, clinic employees and women could have used to protect themselves from the violent acts of these extreme anti-choice demonstrators.”
We can’t forget that violent protests are not a thing of the past--just in the past year there was an attempted firebombing at a Louisiana clinic and one incident of arson in Florida.

So...even though the majority of pro-lifers are peaceful, anyone near an abortion clinic doesn't have a right to be protected by the violence of the few?
I'm not following your logic. Oh, is it because anyone involved in abortion in any way deserves to die?
Freedom of speech does not include firebombing and physically attacking other people, last I checked.