« Quick hit: Who will Bush’s next nominee be? | Main | Maine refuses federal funds for abstinence-only education »
September 21, 2005
NARAL Pro-Choice Ohio speaks out
Check out this great call to action from NARAL Pro-Choice Ohio over a bill that could potentially outlaw abortion entirely in the state. Unbelievable:
This past spring anti-choice representatives in the Ohio House introduced a bill that would completely outlaw abortion in Ohio without exception: not to save a woman's life, not for victims of rape or incest. It would even put someone in jail for 15 years for driving a woman to another state to get an abortion. When he introduced the bill, Rep. Brinkman announced that his plan was to get the bill passed and then take it to the Supreme Court and use it to overturn Roe. Initially this looked like a far-fetched dream, but now with the dual vacancy on the Court, and John Roberts as the nominee for Chief Justice this dream may quickly turn into a reality and a nightmare for women in Ohio.
Pro-choice Ohioans need to stand up now and say NO. We can't let this attack on Roe come from our home state! Please help us keep Brinkman's dreams in his imagination. Protect the right to choose in your community. Check out the NARAL Pro-Choice Ohio website for ways to get involved.
Posted by Jessica at September 21, 2005 12:06 PM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.blogforchoice.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2806
Comments
Above and aside from my shuddering horror at the main part of this proposed law, which I'm sure will be repeated here in short order (my reaction, not the law), let me point out the complete and utter madness of the overreach of power present in the part that attempts to forbid Ohio residents from going out-of-state. This bit of the legislation presumes to override the laws of other states; it tries to override their rights to provide choice to women within their boundaries; it denies people the right to seek asylum from unjust law in other states; it seeks to make Ohio law, law everywhere. What the fuck happened to states' rights, if one state gets to take away another's power over certain people inside it.
You go to Ohio, you follow the laws there. But once you're out of Ohio, citizen or no, you DON'T have to follow Ohio's laws, you can do things that Ohio forbids, if the state you went into allows them. This is important. People should not be prisoners of their homeland when they're not in their homeland.
Back in the pre-Civil War era, the courts ruled that if someone took their slave into a state that didn't allow slavery, the slave was a free person while in that free state. The same must be true with any law. And how apt, that slavery is the previous example of this madness.
BTW, potential loophole: does it say anything to forbid a woman driving herself across state lines to get an abortion? What if she drives over, and the other person just drives her back? Even with the most ill of women, someone could drive right up to the state line, and she could get behind the wheel for twenty feet or so. (This is what's known as a technicality.)
This probably won't work either, but what is their definition of abortion? What if, upon passing this law and (Gods forbid) getting it upheld by the courts, what if Ohio were to see a sudden rise in C-sections, which delivered "babies" that were eight weeks old, three months old, five months old, etc? Technically, it would be a legal birth. Not that that would stop them for long, because although it's already born and thus not important, it enables a woman to have control of her body, and we can't have that now can we?
I'd love to go into greater detail about what I think of this, but I really can't do that without thouroughly violating the comments policy. Imagine at your discretion.
Posted by: Kyra at September 21, 2005 10:15 PM
Kyra;
Thanks for that invitation to imagine. My face feels like it's going to fall off now.
Posted by: katthemad at September 22, 2005 10:26 AM
