Bush v. Choice
Disclaimer About Jessica NARAL Pro-Choice America Contact Us

« Katha Pollitt: “Feminists for (Fetal) Life” | Main | Illinois pharmacists must fill prescriptions for EC »

August 16, 2005

Roberts’ memos reveal more disturbing news

Wow. The fact that Roberts is anti-choice and anti-privacy isn’t news. But today’s Washington Post reveals some pretty shocking stuff. The article details memos that not only further prove Roberts’ commitment to anti-choice nonsense, but also show his straight-up disdain for women’s rights in general:

The memo about the Los Angeles service for aborted fetuses is part of a pattern in the documents issued yesterday by the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library: During his tenure from 1982 to 1986 in the Reagan White House, Roberts staked out conservative positions on a broader array of issues than has previously been known.

He called a federal court decision that sought to guarantee women equal pay to men "a radical redistributive concept." He wrote that a Supreme Court case prohibiting silent prayer in public school "seems indefensible."

What? Equal pay for women is radical?! That’s just lovely.


Posted by Jessica at August 16, 2005 10:15 AM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.blogforchoice.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2745


Comments

Comparative worth was a nutty theory 20 years ago. Today, it's pretty much discredited across the board. His position could hardly be described as radical.


Posted by: tobytyler11 at August 16, 2005 8:08 PM

Comparative worth is nutty? So we must accept the concept of women being semi-human in regards to their ability to contribute to executive decisions? What a load of crap! This whole concept is a huge load of crap. I feel that i am looking up from a huge outhouse of executive stupidity. The central fear of those in power is that they will be exposed. That women will show them how to do it correctly


Posted by: robert at August 21, 2005 5:46 AM

Oh robert. I love your comments.

LOVE Em.


Posted by: Kelz at August 23, 2005 12:59 PM